userinfo senji
2004/11/03 14:48:00 - Divide the States!?
(Poll, with map!)
Current Mood: [mood icon] silly
Entry Tags: poll, recs

link | comment )

userinfo senji
2004/11/03 15:28:00 - Computer Fettlation
Last night, I applied the new 80GB disk to cleopatra, RAIDed the old "junk" partition from the SCSI disks to a partition on the new IDE disk to store usr, home, and var on and created a nice new partition from the rest of the disk. The plan appears to be to put half of our current (out of date) Debian mirror on that.

more geeky stuffCollapse )

In conclusion, everything's working again now; and it wasn't too much pain.
Current Mood: [mood icon] geeky
Entry Tags: cleopatra, debian, geeky, sysadmin

link | comment )

userinfo senji
2004/11/03 15:57:00 - Implausible webquiz
You're Brigitte Bardot!Collapse )
Current Mood: [mood icon] silly
Entry Tags: meme 2004, quizilla

1 gloss | comment )

userinfo senji
2004/11/03 18:24:00 - 2004 Politics Links Post
For obvious reasons a lot of people are writing things about the election at the moment; so I thought I'd try and collect a few together. I'll add more as and when I see them; the main criterion being that they must have content as well as rant...

Current Mood: [mood icon] organised
Entry Tags: andrewwyld, politics, recs, requiem_17_23, ronebofh, usa

link | comment )

userinfo senji
2004/11/03 19:10:00 - "Reality-based" viewpoint
People like pjc50 like talking about people with "reality-based" viewpoints. People like this tend not to vote for people like Bush because he lies, and possibly cheats at elections. People like this read about stuff, follow the news and are keyed into developments. I don't like this term. Reality isn't something solid; it is what you make it. I prefer to call these people "information-based".

How else might we catagorise people? My first thought was "virtue-based". Virtue-based people would vote for people who did things for what they thought were the right reasons, regardless of the outcome. People like this make up some of the core members of the group who oppose "sleaze" in government.

On the other side we have "results-based" people. These people believe that the end does justify the means. People like this may support Bush on the basis that he removed Saddam Hussein from Iraq; but will reserve eventual judgement on Gulf War II until they see how Iraq ends up.

Then I start moving into hazier zones. You have the "don't cares" who believe that it doesn't make a difference to them who is in government, the "traditionalists" who have voted one way or another for 100 years, the "media-based" people who do what the Daily Mail or Fox News tell them to.

Then again, on all sides, you have the idealists. There must be some people out there who actually believe in the trickle-down theory of the economy, and support Big Business; just as there are people who believe in a stable communist state.

I'm not going to try ranking these groups into any kind of hierarchy. I'm an "information-based" person, so I tend to think that that way is best; but some of the other approaches I've mentioned make a certain sort of sense to me, and I can see why they might appeal.

On a related note; here's to Clinton/Leech '08...
Current Mood: [mood icon] thoughtful
Entry Tags: pjc50, politics

12 glosses | comment )

3rd November 2004 - Squaring the circle... — LiveJournal

> log in
> recent entries
> fiends
> archive
> toothywiki page
> profile
> new entry
> recent comments
> previous day
> next day

> previous day
> next day
> go to top