userinfo senji
2004/07/12 08:05:00 - Silly Book Quiz...
Read more...Collapse )
Current Mood: [mood icon] sleepy

1 gloss | comment )

userinfo senji
2004/07/12 12:46:00 - Proposed London Transport Map....

Where's the Chelney Line gone? :(
Current Mood: [mood icon] interested

5 glosses | comment )

userinfo senji
2004/07/12 13:47:00 - The Battle of the Boyne
Today is the day that the Orangemen celebrate the Battle of the Boyne.

However, it seems to me that today is entirely the wrong day to to this on. You see, at the time they were using the Julian calendar, and it was the first day of July, 1690. In the Gregorian calendar at that point in use in mainly Catholic dominated areas of Europe it was the 11th July.

10 years later, in 1700 (or arguably 1699) the Julian Calendar contained a 29th February that didn't exist in the Gregorian Calendar. (To be really picky it included an additional "sixth day before the calends of March" meaning that the last 5 days of the month had a different name, and that the 24th was a day that didn't exist in the Gregorian Calendar; but lets not be really picky).

52 further years later, Great Britain and Dominions moved to the Gregorian Calendar, by decreeing that 14 Sep followed 2 Sep. It would appear that at this time the Orangemen moved the celebration of the Battle of the Boyne to the 12th July.

For the rest of that century this will have provided the correct Julian date for the celebration, but in 1800 (or arguably 1799) the Julian Calendar once again included an additional "sixth day before the calends of March" which the Gregorian Calendar didn't include; such that at this point the Orangemen were one day out and should've been celebrating on the 13th. This happened again in 1900 (or 1899), and will occur again in 2100.

So, in conclusion, the logical dates to celebrate the Battle of the Boyne would be:

  • 1st July: Using the standard "sod it" approach to dealing with these renumbered days.

  • 11th July: The Gregorian date upon which the Battle actually occurred.

  • 14th July: The actual 1st of July in the Julian Calendar.

Current Mood: [mood icon] curious

5 glosses | comment )

userinfo senji
2004/07/12 15:02:00 - [Poll] Hmm...
Currently this entry is sitting at the top of my Recent Entries page; due to being dated 2032.

Should I...

...ignore this.
...delete the entry.
...redate the entry (silently)
...redate the entry (and note the fact)

Current Mood: [mood icon] curious

5 glosses | comment )

userinfo senji
2004/07/12 16:11:00 - Gordon Brown
<ahdok> woo! Gordon Brown's spending review has some dodgy maths in it.
<ahdok> I think he's managed to cover the spending by putting a /2 on the outgoings column.
<Madeleine> ahdok - are you allowed to do that?
<ahdok> well, I don't think your bank would like it.

link | comment )

userinfo senji
2004/07/12 16:54:00 - IM clients
After tracking down another FUCKING BUG in it, and it's another BLOODY IDIOTIC one (and another one where it's not obvious what the correct fix is, either) I've decided that it's an ABSOLUTE PILE OF FOETID WANK. Plus it doesn't seem to do MSN properly.

I think in general, like bletchmail(1) it's a failure of the Bazaar Model of software development.

The client I currently use is centericq(1). The features I appear to need in a client are:

  • Console mode running

  • Runs on Linux

  • Free Software

  • Text based logging; that I can import into CVS

  • Not bitlbee which is just ick

  • Supports ICQ,AIM,Y!M,MSN,Jabber,(GaduGadu)

  • Isn't crap code

Suggestions, anyone?
Current Mood: [mood icon] irritated

20 glosses | comment )

userinfo senji
2004/07/12 17:07:00 - Grinding away at allocation bugs
valgrind(1) on the other hand is an absolutely solid piece of code that I couldn't recommend more highly.

Just wish it ran on ARM... :)

1 gloss | comment )

12th July 2004 - Squaring the circle... — LiveJournal

> log in
> recent entries
> fiends
> archive
> toothywiki page
> profile
> new entry
> recent comments
> previous day
> next day

> previous day
> next day
> go to top